• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
man standing on hill during full moon

Super Computer Hints That Moon Was Made in Hours Not Days

October 12, 2022
Madagascar unique wildlife faces imminent extinction

Madagascar Wildlife World Suddenly In Peril

January 31, 2023
Earth’s Core

Earth’s Core Reduced Spin No Good

January 31, 2023
Nanuqsaurus Art

NANUQSAURUS Explained

January 31, 2023
Pelican

Pelican Has 70 Percent Survival Rate in Santa Barbara

December 19, 2022
1 in 10 species could be lost

Study Warns 1 in 10 Species Could Be Lost by End of 21st Century

December 19, 2022
new type of dolphin

The New Type of Dolphin That Has Evolved in the Pacific Ocean

December 19, 2022
Metaverse headset

Metaverse Headset Alternatives

December 5, 2022
AI powered insect trap

AI Insect Powered Trap and Billion Dollar Pest Problem

November 27, 2022
Medium membership

Medium Writing Platform 2022 Review

November 24, 2022
Boxabl

5 Reasons Boxabl is Better Than Prefab Homes

November 24, 2022
milky way sky

Milky Way Actual Twin Found?

November 21, 2022
supernova in space

Supernova Allows Us to Understand Origin of Elements in the Universe

November 13, 2022
Tuesday, March 14, 2023
45 °f
Us
43 ° Wed
51 ° Thu
54 ° Fri
52 ° Sat
AWDAILY
  • science
    • All
    • astronomy
    • biology
    • environment
    • technology
    • wildlife
    Madagascar unique wildlife faces imminent extinction

    Madagascar Wildlife World Suddenly In Peril

    Earth’s Core

    Earth’s Core Reduced Spin No Good

    Nanuqsaurus Art

    NANUQSAURUS Explained

    Pelican

    Pelican Has 70 Percent Survival Rate in Santa Barbara

    1 in 10 species could be lost

    Study Warns 1 in 10 Species Could Be Lost by End of 21st Century

    new type of dolphin

    The New Type of Dolphin That Has Evolved in the Pacific Ocean

    Metaverse headset

    Metaverse Headset Alternatives

    AI powered insect trap

    AI Insect Powered Trap and Billion Dollar Pest Problem

    milky way sky

    Milky Way Actual Twin Found?

  • business
    • All
    • cryptocurrency
    • economy
    Medium membership

    Medium Writing Platform 2022 Review

    Boxabl

    5 Reasons Boxabl is Better Than Prefab Homes

    manufacturing

    Will Automation Help Manufacturing Grow in the US?

    man sitting facing monitor

    Is Remote Work Employment Here to Stay?

    white airplane near trailers during sunset

    Tourism Bad in 2022 Due to Pilot Shortage

    Manufactured and Tiny Homes to Be Allowed Now

    Manufactured and Tiny Homes to Be Allowed Now

    Gas Prices Continue to Rise in US

    Gas Prices Continue to Rise in US

    Seven Most Affordable Places in the World in 2022

    Seven Most Affordable Places in the World in 2022

    Food Prices in US Begin to Rise in 2022

    Food Prices in US Begin to Rise in 2022

    Will Worldwide Food Prices Soar in 2022

    Will Worldwide Food Prices Soar in 2022

  • wildlife
    Madagascar unique wildlife faces imminent extinction

    Madagascar Wildlife World Suddenly In Peril

    Nanuqsaurus Art

    NANUQSAURUS Explained

    Pelican

    Pelican Has 70 Percent Survival Rate in Santa Barbara

    1 in 10 species could be lost

    Study Warns 1 in 10 Species Could Be Lost by End of 21st Century

    new type of dolphin

    The New Type of Dolphin That Has Evolved in the Pacific Ocean

    AI powered insect trap

    AI Insect Powered Trap and Billion Dollar Pest Problem

    moth larvae

    Moth Larvae Could Be the Answer to Plastic Problems

    wolf standing on rolled hays

    Wildlife is Recovering in Europe After Decades of Conservation

    brown fox lying on black rock

    How Did Ancient Humans Domesticate Foxes?

    black ant on black wire

    There Are Over 2 Million Ants For Every Human Across the Planet

    Trending Tags

    • spotted lantern fly
  • Carbon Calculator
    • Coastal Risk Screening Tool
  • solar calculator
No Result
View All Result
AWDAILY
No Result
View All Result
  • environment
  • science
  • wildlife
  • astronomy
  • technology
  • business
  • economy
  • biology
  • news
  • cryptocurrency
  • solar calculator
  • Coastal Risk Screening Tool
  • Carbon Calculator
Home news science astronomy

Super Computer Hints That Moon Was Made in Hours Not Days

October 12, 2022
in astronomy
Reading Time: 9 mins read
0 0
A A
0
0
SHARES
8
VIEWS
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
man standing on hill during full moon

A super computer simulation suggests the Moon was formed in hours and not days. This theory challenges the widely held view that the Moon took billions of years to form. The simulations suggest the Moon was formed in hours after a collision between the Earth and a Mars-sized object called Theia.

X-ray tomography hints that moon was made in hours not days

The researchers used computer x-ray tomography and high resolution surface scanning to interpret the faint inscriptions on the outer casing of the ancient Egyptian astronomical machine. The machine contained 37 bronze gears that could follow the Moon’s movements through the zodiac, predict eclipses, and model the irregular orbit of the Moon.

Simulations suggest it was sprayed out into orbit by Theia

Scientists from Durham University conducted simulations of an impact with a Mars-sized planet called Theia 4.5 billion years ago. They found that a moon-like object could have been sprayed out into orbit as a result of the collision. The researchers say their findings do not prove that Theia is the moon’s actual origin. But they do suggest the possibility.

The synestia model proposes that Theia was sprayed out into orbit before combining with a little Earth material to form the moon. This would explain the similarity in composition of the two bodies. However, scientists are not likely to detect any similarity between them.

Simulations of Theia show that the massive body would have hit the young Earth’s core. Meaning most of its mantle would have accreted to the Earth. Significant portions of this material would have been sprayed out into orbit, and would have quickly coalesced into the Moon. The authors suggest that about 20% of the original mass of Theia would have ended up in orbiting debris. Furthermore, the moon would have been surrounded by a ring of debris in the early Earth.

Later simulations of the moon’s formation from an impact with Theia rely on more detailed models of the moon’s formation. In contrast to previous simulations, which suggested that the moon gradually formed within a debris disk. The new simulations show that it formed in less than a day. This could be because of the immense temperatures produced during the colossal impact event.

It was then mixed with only a tiny bit of material from Earth

This has challenged previous theories that the moon was formed through the gradual coalescence of matter in a long process. But the new simulations show that the moon was formed instantly, in hours rather than days, and the process could have been much simpler.

Scientists used a supercomputer to simulate a complex network of hydrodynamic and atmospheric forces on a lunar surface. This involved creating simulations that used as many as 100 million particles. These simulations were run at a higher resolution than any previously made, so the accuracy was improved two-fold.

In a higher-resolution simulation, the researchers were able to explain the moon’s visible properties, such as its tilted orbit, partially molten interior, and thin crust. But to confirm this theory, researchers will have to examine samples from the moon’s deep mantle. If the simulations are correct, the findings could shed light on the formation of Earth’s mantle.

Scientists have long been debating whether the moon was created by a giant impact. But they had to deal with the fact that Earth and moon share the same chemical signature, which makes it impossible to determine which was the source. If it were non-Earth, the moon’s composition should be different.

It took billions of years to form

The new study suggests that the moon formed just a few hours after a cataclysmic collision that tore a chunk of Earth off Earth’s surface. The debris then was hurled into space, forming the Moon. In the past, astronomers believed that the moon was formed after a collision between a protoplanet and Earth, which would have created an enormous debris field that allowed the moon to form over many thousands of years.

However, this is not an easy process. The Moon’s composition is complicated and difficult to study, and this study is based on a small group of rocks near the equator. Future missions will explore a different region of the moon and collect more samples. The results of these missions could help scientists better understand how the moon formed.

The high-resolution computer simulations can be used to study the moon in more detail than ever before. They also allow scientists to take high-resolution images of distant objects, such as the Moon. However, if the simulations are performed at too low a resolution, the results could be misleading. For example, if a model car crashed into an aircraft, a low resolution simulation could give a wrong answer. High-resolution simulations have thousands of blocks, which can give more accurate results.

It’s composition is so similar to earth

The Moon is similar to earth in composition. Scientists have used lunar samples to study the composition of the Moon’s atmosphere and to deduce its history. This information has helped them infer the nature of the space environment surrounding the Moon and variations in it over long periods of ancient time.

The composition of the moon is similar to the composition of the earth’s mantle, the outermost layer of the planet. Our moon contains many minerals found on Earth, and scientists believe the composition of the mantle is similar. Composition of the moon’s innermost layer is still a mystery, however. It is believed that the moon’s core is partly molten and contains elements like iron, sulfur, and nickel.

Researchers say that the composition of the moon and earth differ due to the different rock materials. The lunar mantle, which lies 30 miles below the surface of the moon, has a different composition of oxygen compared to the rocks found on the surface. This means that the Moon is a little more similar to earth in terms of its composition than scientists originally thought.

The Earth formed 4.5 billion years ago. The moon formed from the debris of an impact between two proto-planets – theia and earth. Collision debris fused together to form the moon. As they formed, they were largely similar in composition. However, the Moon is slightly metal-poor than the Earth.

The Giant Impact Hypothesis – another theory for the formation of the Moon – is based on the idea that the Moon is made from a mixture of Theia and Earth. Apollo samples have suggested that the Moon is similar to Earth in composition and oxygen isotopes. The theory also explains the extreme similarity of the two bodies.

Moon Creation Theories

One of the moon creation theories is that the moon is the product of a large Earth impact that occurred late in Earth’s rotation, in the right direction, and with enough middle material to form a complete moon. However, there is no hard and fast proof for this theory. It is just a theory that may appeal to some people and might not be true for others.

Coaccretion

The paper Coaccretion in Moon Creation Theories contends that the Earth’s moon is not the original moon, but rather the composite of several accretion processes. Projectiles from various angles collide into disks, which then coalesce and merge to form the current moon.

This theory reconciles multiple lines of evidence and explains the moon’s absence of iron. In this model, the material that formed the Moon came from the outer layers of the Earth and Theia. This would also explain why Earth spun rapidly during its initial spin. Furthermore, the enormous impact energy would have vaporized much of the ejecta, which would explain the Moon’s lack of volatile materials.

The theory also proposes that the Earth and Moon formed at the same time. The Earth and Moon both emerged from a swarm of planetesimals in the early stages of the solar system. This formation would have occurred in the same planetary ‘feeding zone’ and at the same distance from the sun. Because Earth’s gravitational attraction is more powerful than the Moon’s, the Earth and Moon would have formed in a close proximity.

Fission

There are two primary theories on how the Moon formed. The fission theory holds that the moon formed from materials in the early Earth, while the current theory holds that the moon was created following a massive impact event. Each theory provides evidence to support its main claim. For example, the Earth’s tilt and ecliptic plane do not line up with those of the moon, which would suggest that the Moon formed from an impact.

The fission theory was first proposed by George Darwin, the son of evolutionary theorist Charles Darwin. It describes how the moon is so similar to Earth because the Earth’s rotation caused a chunk to break off into space. During its early formation, the chunk was held together by the Earth’s gravity. Until recent discoveries, scientists believed the material that became the moon originated in the Pacific Ocean.

The co-formation of the Earth and moon would have occurred roughly 4.5 billion years ago. This scenario provides a good explanation for the moon’s oxygen isotopes. But as more information about the moon came to light, the co-formation theory was found to have significant problems. In particular, it failed to explain the moon’s lack of an iron core. Thus, new and more credible theories were developed.

Capture

A common hypothesis is that the moon came from another planet when the Earth was young. This theory has some problems though. First, it does not explain how the Moon got so close to Earth. A large object cannot make a close approach to another body without substantial energy loss. Secondly, the captured object would not be able to fit into a circular orbit. Therefore, this theory is not a viable origin theory.

The capture theory, by contrast, is based on the idea that the Moon formed outside the solar system and was captured by Earth’s gravity. However, that theory has a number of problems, including the lack of a regular core. It also has difficulties with explaining the massive angular momentum present in the Earth-moon system today.

One way to solve this problem is to assume that multiple high-velocity impacts formed the Moon. In this scenario, multiple small moonlets collided and merged into the Moon. In this scenario, there is no single “smoking gun,” since each impact would create a disk of material. This disk would then condense into a single moonlet over time.

Collision

New research suggests that the Moon’s formation may have been caused by a series of small collisions. This finding contradicts a widely accepted theory of the moon’s formation that has been around for more than 30 years. A simulation by NASA shows that the moon formed in just a few hours.

Some scientists suggest that the collision occurred between 4.4 billion and 4.45 billion years ago, when the Solar System was only just forming. In this case, the impactor would have had a moderate velocity and a relatively steep impact angle. However, some computer simulations suggest that the initial impactor’s velocity was lower than 4 km/s. The oxygen isotope abundance in lunar rock also suggests that the impact angle was steep.

However, other theories have also been proposed to explain the similarities between the Earth and Moon’s composition. One theory suggests that a small planet collided with the early Earth. The debris from the collision would have coalesced and eventually formed the Moon. The Moon would have formed at the right distance from the Earth to avoid being pulled into the orbit of the Earth by its own gravity.

Provided by Antonio Westley


Disclaimer: This article is meant to be seen as an overview of this subject and not a reflection of viewpoints or opinions as nothing is definitive. So, make sure to do your research and feel free to use this information at your own discretion.


Join 1,389 other subscribers

Tags: astronomyfollowhow was our moon createdhow was the moon createdmoonmoon astrologymoon created by collisionmoon created in hoursmoon factssubscribe
TweetPinShareSend

Related Posts

Milky Way Actual Twin Found?

milky way sky
November 21, 2022
0
10

Using XMM-Newton, milky way scientists have spotted a pair of gas giants orbiting a nearby star called Barnard's Star. The...

Read more

Supernova Allows Us to Understand Origin of Elements in the Universe

supernova in space
November 13, 2022
0
7

The unique evolutionary status of Cassiopeia A makes it one of the most studied supernova remnants. The image of the...

Read more
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
guest

guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Youtube Twitter

My Balance

Login to view your balance.

Leaderboard

Leaderboard is empty

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,389 other subscribers

Translate

Copyright © 2021 AWDAILY

No Result
View All Result
  • science
  • business
  • wildlife
  • Carbon Calculator
    • Coastal Risk Screening Tool
  • solar calculator
Follow AWDAILY on WordPress.com

Copyright © 2021 AWDAILY

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Don`t copy text!
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
:wpds_smile::wpds_grin::wpds_wink::wpds_mrgreen::wpds_neutral::wpds_twisted::wpds_arrow::wpds_shock::wpds_unamused::wpds_cool::wpds_evil::wpds_oops::wpds_razz::wpds_roll::wpds_cry::wpds_eek::wpds_lol::wpds_mad::wpds_sad::wpds_exclamation::wpds_question::wpds_idea::wpds_hmm::wpds_beg::wpds_whew::wpds_chuckle::wpds_silly::wpds_envy::wpds_shutmouth:
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?